[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[exelist] Re: Which PE compressor/protector?

To: <exelist@egroups.com>
Subject: [exelist] Re: Which PE compressor/protector?
From: "Sam" <sbowman@...>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 11:09:20 -0600
Delivered-to: listsaver-of-exelist@egroups.com
Delivered-to: listsaver-egroups-exelist@egroups.com
Mailing-list: contact exelist-owner@egroups.com
Reply-to: exelist@egroups.com

PE-PACK owns hands down! It beats all of them except that UPX is catching up quite quickly. For right now stick with PE-PACK its way more stable.

Â

Get packers at: http://www.suddendischarge.com

Non-DOS section.

Â

Sam

Â

anakin: update the compression libary with jibz new one you need to keep up with UPX

Â

Â

Â

eGroup home: http://www.eGroups.com/list/exelist
Free Web-based e-mail groups by www.eGroups.com

Follow-Ups:
- [exelist] Re: Which PE compressor/protector?
  - From: "Aitor G?mez Gonz?lez" <aitor.gomez@...>

Prev by Date: [exelist] Re: Which PE compressor/protector?
Next by Date: [exelist] GetTyp 2.16
Previous by thread: [exelist] Re: Which PE compressor/protector?
Next by thread: [exelist] Re: Which PE compressor/protector?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread