[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [exelist] Any Secure EXE Protection?
- To: gshawn2 <exelist@yahoogroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [exelist] Any Secure EXE Protection?
- From: KaKTuZ <KaKTuZ@...>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:22:16 +0200
- In-reply-to: <abj5si+jlaf@...>
- References: <abj5si+jlaf@...>
- Reply-to: KaKTuZ <kaktuz@...>
Hi gshawn2,
As much as I hate to say that, Alexey Solodovnikov's ASProtect offers
the best overall protection on the market at the moment. True, you can
still unpack it and what not, but that's besides the point, as *any*
protection of that sort can be defeated in a similar way. What
ASProtect gives you is a good quality of protection, secure
keygeneration routines (blast those carders in a next release),
convenient API and good price. I would say you should go for it, the
URL is: www.aspack.com, just FYI.
--
KaKTuZ
Saturday, May 11, 2002, 3:21:22 PM, you wrote:
g> Hello, I just found out about this mailing list and I have to say I
g> am excited to participate in it. There is so much to learn in this
g> area!
g> I am currently developing an application for Windows... I am trying
g> to implement a decent protection so that my software will not be
g> hacked easily. I realize that there is no truly safe protection
g> scheme, however I'd like your input on the following two questions:
g> 1) what does a PE-encryptor do, that is different from what a PE-
g> packer does? is it usually considered better protection to first
g> wrap the PE with an encryptor, and then with a packer?
g> 2) which PE-encryptor/PE-packer is considered to offer the best
g> protection against hackers/crackers today? It seems there are so
g> many and it is difficult to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of
g> each one of them!